SiteGround Vs Bluehost

A successful website must be built on a solid foundation – a reliable and dependable web host. To help you determine the right web hosting company for your site, I’ll be reviewing SiteGround vs Bluehost, two established firms.

To give you an accurate picture of how they stack up, I came up with several tests. Each one measures an important component of a successful web hosting service. The next section describes these tests in detail

SiteGround Vs Bluehost Tests

These are the tests I’ll be discussing in this SiteGround vs Bluehost review:

  • SiteGround Vs Bluehost Uptime
  • SiteGround Vs Bluehost Website Speed Test
  • Website Server Response time
  • Benchmark Test
  • Customer Support
  • Control Panel with Demo
  • Credibility Test

SiteGround Vs Bluehost Uptime

You can’t have a reliable website if the web hosting service is down. SiteGround has an enviable 99.99% uptime record. They have created custom software which constantly monitors their systems, switching servers on the fly if any equipment goes down.

Bluehost has been more challenged in this area. Some internet reviews have mentioned complaints and frustrations with outages and downtime.

Winner: SiteGround – SiteGround’s superior technology results in better uptime results.

We use real time live uptime tracking of website hosted under HostGator and DreamHost for understanding their uptime.


SiteGround Vs Bluehost Website Speed Test

We’ve all been frustrated by slow loading websites. SiteGround is consistently faster than Bluehost. Their extensive SuperCacher system speeds up the assembly of each web page request that comes in. It separates files by type and assigns Static, Dynamic or Memcache to each one.

In Bluehost’s favor, they control all of their data center equipment. In fact, they created a bespoke version of the Linux kernel to run their servers. Since they are smaller, they have fewer data centers.

Winner: SiteGround – the impressive SuperCacher keeps them ahead of Bluehost.

Site on SiteGround


Site on Bluehost


Website Server Response Time

My testing covered a number of websites over time. SiteGround servers consistently had faster server response time than Bluehost. SiteGround has datacenters around the world: Chicago, Amsterdam and Singapore.

SiteGround outperformed Bluehost on every site we tested. Bluehost is dedicated to WordPress and other software platforms, but their overall speed has been called “sluggish” in some internet reviews.

Winner: SiteGround’s worldwide server footprint puts them ahead of Bluehost in this category.

Hosting : SiteGround; Source: Google Analytics

SiteGround Server Response time


Hosting : Bluehost; Source: Google Analytics

Bluehost Server response time

Benchmark Test

Benchmarks are key testing areas that give us a quick look at how each web hosting service is performing at any point in time. These are specific tests like Failed Requests, Median Connect and Processing, Completed Requests and Transfer Rate.

Both companies have good benchmark numbers, depending on the category. Bluehost counts on their advanced 10 Gig Ethernet network using Dual Quad Processors, while SiteGround has data centers in strategic locations around the world.

Winner: Tie – each firm performs well on different benchmark tests.

Customer Support

SiteGround works diligently to support their clients in a myriad of ways. Support channels include a 24/7 ticket system, live chat and telephone. The company over-staffs the support channels so you don’t have to wait long for an answer.

One of Bluehost’s hallmarks is their support for dedicated software platforms like WordPress and Joomla. There is a live chat system and an extensive offering of video tutorials covering different support questions.

Winner: SiteGround has made a concerted effort over the years to speed up their entire customer support operation, making sure questions are handled rapidly.

Also Read: HostGator Vs DreamHost Review

Control Panel with Demo

SiteGround and Bluehost both use cPanel as their control panel of choice. The reason is cPanel is the most popular system in the web hosting industry.

SiteGround has added several additional third party tools including SpamExperts and CloudFlare. Bluehost is good for website owners who have never used a control panel before as they have a Getting Started section above the main cPanel window.

Winner: Tie – both SiteGround and Bluehost utilize cPanel in a productive way to help website owners get more out of their files, email setups and databases.

Credibility Test

SiteGround has been in operation for more than a decade. They started up in 2003 when a number of information technology pros put their resources together and decided to create a new web hosting service.

It is a private company with offices in Texas, New York and Sofia, Bulgaria. Their data centers are located in United States, Amsterdam and Singapore.

Bluehost is smaller — handling just over 1 million customers. They began back in the mid-1990s, and have concentrated on slow, steady growth. Although they are not as large as other providers, at this point in time they have developed into one of the top web hosting services in the industry

Winner: Tie – both SiteGround and Bluehost have good credibility factors and are recognized by the industry as long-term players.

SiteGround Vs Bluehost – Which Should Be Your Choice?

We have covered a lot of ground in this SiteGround vs Bluehost review, but which service should you choose? Here are the reasons you should choose SiteGround:

  • Impressive near-perfect uptime record that has lasted more than 60 months in a row.
  • High quality servers with data centers in the US, Europe and Asia.
  • Unusually responsive customer support based on custom-made ticketing software.
  • Industry-standard cPanel with added third-party features for extra versatility and utility.
  • Low-cost plans for all sizes of businesses and organizations
  • Worldwide presence with multiple executive offices.
  • High-level systems that include secondary generators, automatic backups and redundant power supply equipment.